Interpleader Suits (s.88, O.35) — CPC & Limitation Act Notes

Interpleader Suits (s.88, O.35)

A warehouse holds goods that both A and B claim as their own. The warehouse-keeper does not want the goods — he only wants to hand them to the right owner without being sued twice. So he files a suit asking the two claimants to fight it out among themselves, and steps aside. That is an interpleader suit.

What “interpleader” means

Inter-pleader literally means the parties plead against each other. It solves the plight of an innocent holder (“stakeholder”) caught between rival claimants. Picture a referee who holds the trophy but has no stake in who wins — he just wants to hand it to the true winner and be left alone.

What — a suit filed by a person who holds property/money, claims no interest in it (except charges/costs), and faces two or more adverse claimants, so that the court decides to whom it belongs (s.88, O.35).
Why — to protect the stakeholder from the risk and expense of double vexation (being sued separately by each claimant) and from deciding a title dispute himself.
Who — the plaintiff is the neutral stakeholder; the defendants are the rival claimants who must interplead.
When — where the same debt/sum/property is claimed adversely by two or more persons from a holder who is willing to deliver it to the rightful claimant.
Where — a competent civil court; the plaint must comply with O.35 r.1.
How — the stakeholder files the plaint stating he claims no interest (other than charges), that there is no collusion with any claimant, and offers to bring the property into court (O.35 r.1). The court may discharge the stakeholder, award him costs, and then decide the contest between the claimants (r.4).

Who cannot sue. An agent cannot interplead against his principal, nor a tenant against his landlord, to question the principal’s/landlord’s title (O.35 r.5).

🧩 WORKED EXAMPLE — the caught-in-the-middle bank

Facts. A bank holds ₹5,00,000 in a deposit. Both X (a nominee) and Y (a legal heir) demand it. The bank claims nothing for itself.

Rule. s.88 / O.35 r.1 — a holder with no interest, facing adverse claims, may file an interpleader suit so the claimants fight it out.

Apply. The bank sues X and Y as defendants, deposits the money in court, and asks to be discharged.

Conclusion. The court discharges the bank with its costs and decides whether X or Y is entitled — the bank avoids being sued twice.

Section 88 CPC: “Where two or more persons claim adversely to one another the same debt, sum of money or other property, movable or immovable, from another person, who claims no interest therein other than for charges or costs and who is ready to pay or deliver it to the rightful claimant, such other person may institute a suit of interpleader against all the claimants…”

In Simple Terms: If you are holding something two people are fighting over and you do not want it yourself, you can hand it to the court and let the two claimants battle it out — so you are not dragged into two separate suits.

flowchart TD
    ROOT["Stakeholder holds property, claims no interest"]:::root
    ROOT --> A["Two or more adverse claimants (X and Y)"]:::leaf
    A --> B["s.88 / O.35 r.1 — file interpleader suit"]:::leaf
    B --> C["Deposit property in court; no collusion"]:::leaf
    C --> D["r.4 — stakeholder discharged with costs"]:::leaf
    D --> E["Court decides contest between claimants"]:::leaf
    classDef root fill:#FFF8DC,stroke:#000,stroke-width:1px,color:#000;
    classDef leaf fill:#E6F3FF,stroke:#1E3A8A,color:#000;
    linkStyle default stroke:#888,stroke-width:1px;

Case Laws

National Insurance Co Ltd v Dhirendra Nath (1997) — an interpleader suit lies only where the plaintiff claims no interest in the subject-matter beyond charges or costs.
Groom v Booth (1893) — the essence of interpleader is that the plaintiff is a mere stakeholder who is ready to deliver to the rightful claimant.

📄 Full notes + Question Bank (₹199) — every topic in depth, model answers to all past KSLU questions, in one printable PDF. Get the bundle · 10 Solved Problems · All CPC & Limitation Act topics