Laxmidas Dayabhai Kabrawala v Nanabhai Chunilal Kabrawala (1964)

CPC & Limitation Act · Parties — Joinder, Misjoinder & Non-joinder; Frame of Suit

Facts.

A dispute involved cross-demands between the parties arising out of connected dealings, raising the question of set-off and counter-claim in the same suit.

Issue.

When is an equitable set-off available, and what is the nature of a counter-claim?

Held.

The Supreme Court explained that an equitable set-off is allowed where cross-demands arise from the same transaction, even if the amount is unascertained, and that a counter-claim operates as an independent cross-action which the court can decide along with the main suit.

Why it matters.

It is the leading case distinguishing legal set-off, equitable set-off and counter-claim — the exact distinction the exam asks for.

📄 Full CPC & Limitation Act notes + Question Bank (₹199) — every topic in depth, model answers to all past exam questions, in one printable PDF. Get the bundle · All landmark cases · All CPC & Limitation Act topics