Company Meetings and Resolutions — Company Law Notes

Company Meetings and Resolutions

A company “decides” things not by a boardroom conversation but by a valid meeting producing a resolution. Miss a single formality — proper notice, quorum, the right kind of resolution — and the whole decision can collapse. The examiner tests exactly these formalities through crisp problems.

Kinds of meetings

A. Meetings of members (shareholders):

Annual General Meeting — AGM (s.96): held once every calendar year, with not more than 15 months between two AGMs; the first AGM within 9 months of the first financial year-end. Deals with accounts, dividend, director appointments, auditor. (A One Person Company need not hold an AGM.)
Extra-ordinary General Meeting — EGM (s.100): any general meeting other than the AGM, called by the Board or on requisition by members (holding ≥1/10 of paid-up capital) for urgent business.
Class meeting: of a particular class of shareholders (e.g. preference shareholders) to vary their rights.

(The old statutory meeting — a one-time meeting of a public company soon after incorporation — was a feature of the 1956 Act and is not retained in the 2013 Act; if asked, describe it as the first meeting held once to report the company’s formation position.)

B. Meetings of directors: Board meetings (s.173) — at least four a year, with a gap of not more than 120 days; and committee meetings.

Requisites of a valid meeting

A meeting is valid only if:

Proper authority convenes it (usually the Board);
Proper notice is given — 21 clear days for a general meeting (s.101), stating the time, place and agenda, to every member/director entitled;
Quorum is present (s.103) — the minimum number: for a public company 5/15/30 members depending on size; for a private company 2; for a Board meeting, 1/3 of total strength or two directors, whichever is higher (s.174);
a chairman presides;
business is transacted and minutes recorded.

Key trap (🔑): every director has a right to notice of a Board meeting. If some validly-appointed directors are deliberately kept out, the meeting is invalid even if a quorum was present — the missing notice vitiates it.

Resolutions

Ordinary resolution (s.114(1)) — passed by a simple majority (votes for > votes against). Used for ordinary business (adopting accounts, declaring dividend, appointing directors/auditors, removing a director).
Special resolution (s.114(2)) — passed by at least 3/4 of members voting; notice must specify the intention. Used for fundamental matters (alter MOA/AOA, reduce capital, buy-back, winding up).

Section 96(1): every company (other than an OPC) “shall in each year hold… a general meeting as its annual general meeting… and not more than fifteen months shall elapse between the date of one annual general meeting… and that of the next.”

In Simple Terms: Companies act through meetings. Members meet at the yearly AGM and, for urgent matters, an EGM; directors meet at least four times a year. A meeting is valid only with proper authority, 21 days’ notice, a quorum, a chairman and minutes — and every director must be invited. Decisions are taken by ordinary (simple majority) or special (3/4) resolution.

flowchart TD
    ROOT["Company meetings"]:::root
    ROOT --> M["Members"]:::mid
    ROOT --> B["Board (s.173): min 4/year"]:::mid2
    M --> M1["AGM (s.96): yearly, gap <=15 months"]:::leaf
    M --> M2["EGM (s.100): urgent"]:::leaf
    M --> M3["Class meeting"]:::leaf
    ROOT --> R["Resolutions"]:::mid2
    R --> R1["Ordinary (s.114(1)): simple majority"]:::leaf
    R --> R2["Special (s.114(2)): 3/4 majority"]:::leaf
    classDef root fill:#FFF8DC,stroke:#000,color:#000;
    classDef mid fill:#DCFCE7,stroke:#166534,color:#000;
    classDef mid2 fill:#FDE8D0,stroke:#92400E,color:#000;
    classDef leaf fill:#E6F3FF,stroke:#1E3A8A,color:#000;
    linkStyle default stroke:#888,stroke-width:1px;

🧩 WORKED EXAMPLE — directors kept out of a Board meeting

Facts. Some directors hold a Board meeting but deliberately prevent certain lawfully-appointed directors from attending. A quorum was, however, present.

Rule. Every director has a right to notice of, and to attend, Board meetings; excluding validly-appointed directors makes the meeting invalid despite a quorum.

Apply. The excluded directors were denied notice/attendance, a fundamental defect.

Decoy. “A quorum was present” — quorum cannot cure the denial of notice to entitled directors.

Conclusion. The Board meeting is invalid, and resolutions passed at it are void.

Case Laws

Sharp v Dawes (1876) — one person cannot generally constitute a “meeting”; quorum needs the minimum number.
Bharat Kumar v British India Corporation (1993) — notice to all directors is essential to a valid Board meeting.

📄 Full notes + Question Bank (₹199) — every topic in depth, model answers to all past KSLU questions, in one printable PDF. Get the bundle · 10 Solved Problems · All Company Law topics