Negligence — Duty, Breach & Damage

“You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour.”Lord Atkin, Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932)

Negligence is the breach of a legal duty to take care which results in damage to the plaintiff. It is the most heavily litigated tort of all.


The Three Essentials

flowchart TD
    A["Negligence requires…"]:::root
    A --> B["1. DUTY of care owed to the plaintiff<br/>(the neighbour principle — Donoghue v. Stevenson)"]:::leaf
    A --> C["2. BREACH of that duty<br/>(failing the reasonable-man standard)"]:::leaf
    A --> D["3. DAMAGE caused by the breach<br/>and not too remote"]:::leaf

    classDef root fill:#FFF8DC,stroke:#333,color:#000;
    classDef leaf fill:#E6F3FF,stroke:#1E3A8A,color:#000;
    linkStyle default stroke:#888,stroke-width:1px;
  1. Duty of careDonoghue v. Stevenson (1932) established the neighbour principle: you owe a duty to persons so closely and directly affected by your act that you ought reasonably to have them in contemplation. (A manufacturer of ginger beer owed a duty to the ultimate consumer who found a decomposed snail in the bottle.)
  2. Breach — measured against the reasonable man: what a prudent person would have foreseen and guarded against, weighing the likelihood and seriousness of harm against the cost of precautions.
  3. Damage — the breach must have caused actual, legally recognised damage that is not too remote.

Contributory Negligence & Nervous Shock

  • Contributory negligence — where the plaintiff’s own carelessness contributed to the harm, his damages are reduced in proportion to his share of fault (historically it barred recovery entirely).
  • Nervous shock — a recognisable psychiatric illness caused by a reasonably foreseeable shock is actionable even without physical impact (Bourhill v. Young; the Indian Halligua line) — provided the shock and resulting illness were foreseeable.

Closely tied to negligence is res ipsa loquitur — where the accident itself implies negligence. See the dedicated page →


📄 Get all 5 units — Notes + Question Bank (₹199) with 50+ solved problems and 16-mark essay blueprints. Buy the bundle · Free Unit 1 sample · All Law of Torts topics

Info

download our exam preparation kit for your exam