Sale & Lease of Immovable Property — Transfer of Property Notes

Sale of Immovable Property

A “sale” and an “agreement to sell” sound like the same thing to a buyer handing over money — but the law treats them worlds apart. One passes ownership today; the other only promises to pass it tomorrow. Section 54’s last line is where countless disputes are won: “a contract for sale does not, of itself, create any interest in the property.”

What is a Sale? (Section 54)

A sale is a transfer of ownership in exchange for a price paid or promised (or part-paid, part-promised). The essentials:

• Parties — a competent seller (owner or authorised) and a competent buyer.
• Subject-matter — specific immovable property.
• Transfer of ownership — the whole interest passes (unlike a lease or mortgage).
• Price — money consideration, paid or promised (if the consideration is another property, it is an exchange, not a sale).
• Mode — a sale of tangible immovable property worth Rs. 100 or more must be by a registered instrument; below Rs. 100 it may be by registered deed or by delivery of possession.

Sale versus contract for sale. A contract for sale is merely an agreement that a sale shall take place on agreed terms. Section 54 expressly says it does not, of itself, create any interest in or charge on the property. So a contract for sale gives only a right in personam (a right to sue for specific performance), not ownership.

Rights and liabilities of seller and buyer (Section 55). The Act reads default duties into every sale, split into before and after completion:

• Seller’s duties before completion: to disclose material defects in the property or title known to him and not known to the buyer; to produce title-deeds for examination; to answer the buyer’s relevant questions on title; to execute a proper conveyance on payment; and to take care of the property and title-deeds between contract and sale.
• Seller’s duties after completion: to give possession; to covenant that his title is good (implied covenant for title); and to deliver title-deeds on receiving the whole price.
• Seller’s rights: to the rents and profits till the price is paid; and, where the ownership has passed but the price is unpaid, a seller’s charge/lien on the property for the unpaid price.
• Buyer’s duties: to disclose facts materially increasing the value of the property known to him and not the seller; to pay the price; to bear loss to the property after ownership passes; and to pay outgoings after the sale.
• Buyer’s rights: to any improvement or increase in value and to the rents and profits after ownership passes; and a charge on the property for the price prepaid if the sale does not go through (a buyer’s lien).

Seller’s lien is the seller’s charge on the sold property for the unpaid purchase-money even after ownership has passed to the buyer — the property remains answerable for the price.

Section 54, TPA: “‘Sale’ is a transfer of ownership in exchange for a price paid or promised or part-paid and part-promised. … A contract for the sale of immovable property is a contract that a sale of such property shall take place on terms settled between the parties. It does not, of itself, create any interest in or charge on such property.”

In Simple Terms: A sale hands over ownership for a price and, for land worth Rs. 100+, must be by a registered deed. An agreement to sell only promises a future sale — it creates no ownership, just a right to sue for performance. The Act then loads each side with duties: mainly, the seller must disclose defects and give clear title and possession; the buyer must pay and take the risk once ownership passes.

🧩 WORKED EXAMPLE — sale versus agreement to sell

Facts. S signs an agreement to sell his plot to B next month; B pays an advance. Before the deed is executed, S sells and conveys the plot to C by a registered sale deed.

Rule. Section 54 — a contract for sale creates no interest in the property; ownership passes only on a completed (registered) sale.

Apply. B had only a contract (a right to sue S for specific performance), not ownership. C got a registered conveyance and ownership.

Conclusion. Ownership vests in C; B’s remedy is a suit against S for specific performance or damages, not the plot itself (unless C had notice/lis pendens applies).

flowchart TD
    A["Sale (s.54): ownership for a price"]
    A --> B["Rs.100+ tangible immovable: registered deed required"]
    A --> C["Contract for sale: NO interest created — only right to sue"]
    A --> D["s.55 duties"]
    D --> E["Seller: disclose defects, give title & possession, lien for unpaid price"]
    D --> F["Buyer: pay price, bear risk after ownership passes"]
    classDef box fill:#e8f0fe,stroke:#333,color:#111;
    class A,B,C,D,E,F box;

Case Laws

• Rambaran Prosad v Ram Mohit Hazra (1967) — a contract for sale creates no interest in the property; it only gives a right to obtain a conveyance.
• Narandas Karsondas v S.A. Kamtam (1977) — ownership passes only on a registered sale deed; till then the buyer has no title.

Back to Top

Lease of Immovable Property

When you rent a flat, the owner does not stop owning it — he simply parts with the right to live in it for a time. That split — possession to the tenant, the reversion to the landlord — is the whole idea of a lease, and s.108 fills in the give-and-take between them.

What is a Lease? (Section 105)

A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy the property for a certain time (or in perpetuity) in consideration of a price (premium) or rent paid or promised. The transferor is the lessor, the transferee the lessee; the price is the premium and the periodical payment is the rent. Unlike a sale, no ownership passes — only possession and the right to enjoy; the lessor keeps the reversion.

Essentials of a lease:

• Competent lessor and lessee.
• Immovable property as subject-matter.
• Transfer of a right to enjoy (possession), not ownership.
• A definite term (or in perpetuity) — certainty of duration.
• Consideration — rent or premium.
• Acceptance by the lessee.

How a lease is made (Section 107). A lease of immovable property from year to year, or for a term exceeding one year, or reserving a yearly rent can be made only by a registered instrument. Other leases (short leases) may be made by a registered instrument or by an oral agreement accompanied by delivery of possession.

Rights and liabilities of lessor and lessee (Section 108). In the absence of a contract, s.108 implies:

• Lessor’s liabilities: to disclose material defects in the property; to give possession on request; and to secure the lessee’s quiet enjoyment (covenant for quiet enjoyment) so long as he pays rent and observes the terms.
• Lessee’s rights: to any accession to the property during the lease; to avoid the lease if a material part is destroyed by fire, flood, etc.; to make repairs the lessor neglects and deduct the cost from rent; and to remove fixtures he attached, before he gives up possession.
• Lessee’s liabilities: to disclose facts materially increasing the value known to him; to pay rent; to keep the property in the condition he got it (reasonable wear and tear excepted) and not commit waste; to use it reasonably and not for a purpose other than that for which it was leased; to not erect permanent structures without the lessor’s consent (except for agriculture); and to restore possession on determination.

Determination of a lease (Section 111). A lease of immovable property determines (ends):

• by efflux of the time limited;
• where the term is tied to an event, on the happening of that event;
• on termination of the lessor’s interest (in certain cases);
• by merger (the interests of lessor and lessee unite in one person);
• by express surrender or implied surrender;
• by forfeiture — where the lessee breaks a condition, denies the lessor’s title, or is adjudicated insolvent, and the lessor gives notice of his intention to determine; and
• by notice to quit (in a periodic lease).

Holding over (Section 116). If a lessee remains in possession after the lease ends and the lessor accepts rent or otherwise assents to his continuing, the lease is renewed from year to year or month to month according to the purpose (unless a contract provides otherwise). This is “holding over” — a new tenancy by conduct, different from a mere tenant-at-sufferance.

Section 105, TPA: “A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, made for a certain time, express or implied, or in perpetuity, in consideration of a price paid or promised, or of money, a share of crops, service or any other thing of value, to be rendered periodically or on specified occasions to the transferor by the transferee, who accepts the transfer on such terms.”

In Simple Terms: A lease hands the tenant the right to use and possess land for a set time for rent; ownership stays with the landlord. Longer leases need a registered deed. The Act then divides duties — the landlord must give possession and quiet enjoyment; the tenant must pay rent, not damage or misuse the property, and give it back at the end. A lease ends by time, notice, surrender, forfeiture or merger; and if the tenant stays on with the landlord accepting rent, a new tenancy arises (holding over).

🧩 WORKED EXAMPLE — the tenant who alters and sub-lets

Facts. A takes a house on lease from B; without B’s consent A adds two rooms and sub-lets to C. What can B do against A and C?

Rule. Section 108 — a lessee must not erect permanent structures without consent and must use the property as agreed; unauthorised construction and (if the lease bars assignment) sub-letting can be a breach. Section 111(g) — on breach of an express condition, the lessor may forfeit the lease by notice.

Apply. A’s unauthorised permanent construction breaches s.108; if the lease forbids sub-letting, the sub-lease to C is also a breach. B may claim damages for the breach and, on a forfeiture clause, determine the lease by notice.

Conclusion. B may sue A for damages/injunction for the unauthorised construction and, where a condition is broken and a forfeiture clause exists, forfeit the lease; C, a sub-lessee, can be no better off than A and must also vacate on forfeiture.

Lease versus Licence

Students constantly confuse these two, and examiners exploit it. A lease transfers an interest in the land — the right to exclusive possession — whereas a licence (Indian Easements Act, 1882, s.52) is a bare permission to do something on another’s land that would otherwise be unlawful, creating no interest in the property. The decisive test, laid down in Associated Hotels of India v R.N. Kapoor (1959), is exclusive possession: if the occupier has it, the grant is usually a lease whatever the document calls itself; if he does not, it is a licence.

In Simple Terms: hand over exclusive possession and you have granted a lease — even if the paper says “licence”; give mere permission to use, and it stays a licence.

flowchart TD
    A["Lease (s.105): right to enjoy for a term, for rent"]
    A --> B["Made (s.107): >1 yr / yearly = registered deed; short = oral + possession"]
    A --> C["Rights & duties (s.108): lessor gives possession & quiet enjoyment; lessee pays rent, no waste/misuse, restores"]
    A --> D["Ends (s.111): time, event, merger, surrender, forfeiture, notice"]
    A --> E["Holding over (s.116): stays on + rent accepted = new tenancy"]
    classDef box fill:#e8f0fe,stroke:#333,color:#111;
    class A,B,C,D,E box;

Case Laws

• Associated Hotels of India v R.N. Kapoor (1959) — the test of a lease versus a licence is whether exclusive possession is transferred; a lease creates an interest in the property.
• Bhawanji Lakhamshi v Himatlal Jamnadas (1972) — holding over under s.116 requires the lessor’s assent (usually acceptance of rent) to the tenant’s continued possession.

Back to Top

📄 Full notes + Question Bank (₹199) — every topic in depth, model answers to all past KSLU questions, in one printable PDF. Get the bundle · 10 Solved Problems · All Transfer of Property topics